The first anti-AI protester to be jailed has a message for OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta: ‘Regain your humanity’
An activist who blocked the entrance to one of the world’s biggest AI companies is believed to have become the first person jailed for protesting against artificial intelligence as supporters dub her the “Rosa Parks of AI risk”.
Wynd Kaufman, 69, surrendered herself on Friday to authorities in San Francisco. She was found guilty by a jury for her role in an action last year that saw members of the group StopAI chain and lock the front doors of OpenAI’s headquarters in protest against the pursuit of artificial superintelligence.
The retired teacher from Berkeley, California, refused to move from a sit-in protest in February 2025 and pleaded not guilty to multiple misdemeanor charges. She was convicted in June of interfering with a business, trespassing with intent to interfere with a business, unlawful assembly and refusal to disburse a riot. On Friday, sheriff’s officers handcuffed her as fellow campaigners sang to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic (Glory, Glory Hallelujah): “Rise up, rise up and join us/Do not let the tech bros destroy us.”
“It’s absolutely frightening and appalling that these CEOs and AI experts know the dangers and they are pursuing it anyway,” Kaufmyn said before she was imprisoned. “That to me is unconscionable and reprehensible.”
She said she was willing to go to jail not because she was a martyr but because it was an “issue of sounding the alarm, challenging the system and hopefully trying to get the message out”.
Brooke Jenkins, the San Francisco district attorney, said the guilty verdict sent “a resounding message rejecting the notion that protesters can endanger public safety as a means to an end”.
As Kaufmyn was led out from the court, her supporters called out: “Stop AI” and: “Free Wynd” as the sheriff’s officer yelled: “Clear the court” and the judge admonished the protesters.
Dwight Ost, 73, one of two dozen other StopAI activists at the courthouse, called Kaufmyn “a brave and courageous woman”.
“There’s an existential threat that I believe in,” he said. “They can’t control it, and even the so-called experts don’t know what it’s about.”
Kaufmyn had argued that the protest was a necessity and that she believed she was allowed to act to prevent a greater harm from happening. Since the lobby sit-in last year, some of the biggest AI labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic, have reported their models escaping the confinements of experiments.
This week, the US senator Bernie Sanders demanded tech leaders pause AI development, citing fears that, in the wrong hands, it might “lead to new bioweapons that result in the deaths of tens of millions of people”.
Meanwhile, more than a thousand researchers at frontier AI labs this summer signed a letter warning of “a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems”.
Frontier AI labs are locked in a race to create more capable AI models as the companies target IPOs that are forecast to reach valuations in the trillions of dollars. At the same time, Washington is competing with Beijing for supremacy in the fast-developing technology, creating a disincentive for tougher safety regulation.
“The jury rejected [Kayfmyn’s] necessity defence, but as the first person to go to jail over this, Wynd Kaufmyn could go down in history as the Rosa Parks of AI risk,” said David Kreuger, a University of Montreal AI safety expert who has warned AI “may literally lead to human extinction, in the same way that humans have caused many other species to go extinct”. Parks was a Black woman who refused to give up her bus seat for a white passenger in contravention of racist segregation laws in 1950s Alabama, a catalyzing incident for the US civil rights movement of the ensuing decade.
after newsletter promotion
Kaufmyn spoke on the eve of her imprisonment from her shingled house in Berkeley, which is festooned with Mexican tiles and pro-Gaza signs. She played down the Parks parallel, pointing out her short sentence, but said the comparison had also crossed the campaign group’s mind, given that she is thought to be the first AI protester jailed.
She said that when she was found guilty, she was “hit with a wave of grief” because she realised her peers “just didn’t get” the danger she believes is posed by the race to superintelligence. But she was beginning to feel “vindicated” as more prominent figures like Sanders were speaking out. She is now braced for the prison experience of an orange jump suit, “horrible food, dirt [and] you can’t sleep”. She has been previously jailed for short periods related to her decades of political activism over causes including Nicaragua, nuclear disarmament, western Sahara and Palestine.
Her message to the chief executives of OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta, which also reported a security incident with its model, was “regain your humanity”. Kaufman said her target audience was ordinary people “and the message being: stop the progress of this technology. Let’s get a global ban on the race to superintelligence.”
Professor Stuart Russell, a leading AI professor at the University of California at Berkeley and president of the International Association for Safe and Ethical AI, gave evidence in Kaufmyn’s defence. He claimed OpenAI’s activities “pose an unacceptable risk”, alleging it had deployed AI systems with inadequate safeguards. He said that further development of these systems “must be conditioned on rigorous guarantees of safety, which are currently unavailable”.
Russell said: “Wynd stood up for her beliefs and is being punished.” He said her beliefs seemed reasonable but “what is unreasonable is allowing a process to continue whereby private entities knowingly create a substantial extinction risk for private gain”.
StopAI has been roiled by its own controversies. Last November, its co-founder, Sam Kirchner, 27, went missing after an internal bust-up over whether or not to use violent tactics. He is said to have told colleagues the “non-violence ship has sailed”, raising concerns he might take violent action against OpenAI employees. StopAI aims to pursue non-violent direct action.
OpenAI was approached for comment.
Read the full story at The Guardian ↗
Wynd Kaufman, 69, chained and locked the front doors of OpenAI’s headquarters last year with members of StopAI. An activist who blocked the entrance to one of the world’s biggest…
This lens runs the verified story through Cinnamon's AI — wired in the next step.
An activist who blocked the entrance to one of the world’s biggest AI companies is believed to have become the first person jailed for protesting against artificial intelligence as supporters dub her the “Rosa Parks of AI risk”.
Wynd Kaufman, 69, surrendered herself on Friday to authorities in San Francisco. She was found guilty by a jury for her role in an action last year that saw members of the group StopAI chain and lock the front doors of OpenAI’s headquarters in protest against the pursuit of artificial superintelligence.
The retired teacher from Berkeley, California, refused to move from a sit-in protest in February 2025 and pleaded not guilty to multiple misdemeanor charges. She was convicted in June of interfering with a business, trespassing with intent to interfere with a business, unlawful assembly and refusal to disburse a riot. On Friday, sheriff’s officers handcuffed her as fellow campaigners sang to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic (Glory, Glory Hallelujah): “Rise up, rise up and join us/Do not let the tech bros destroy us.”
“It’s absolutely frightening and appalling that these CEOs and AI experts know the dangers and they are pursuing it anyway,” Kaufmyn said before she was imprisoned. “That to me is unconscionable and reprehensible.”
She said she was willing to go to jail not because she was a martyr but because it was an “issue of sounding the alarm, challenging the system and hopefully trying to get the message out”.
Brooke Jenkins, the San Francisco district attorney, said the guilty verdict sent “a resounding message rejecting the notion that protesters can endanger public safety as a means to an end”.
As Kaufmyn was led out from the court, her supporters called out: “Stop AI” and: “Free Wynd” as the sheriff’s officer yelled: “Clear the court” and the judge admonished the protesters.
Dwight Ost, 73, one of two dozen other StopAI activists at the courthouse, called Kaufmyn “a brave and courageous woman”.
“There’s an existential threat that I believe in,” he said. “They can’t control it, and even the so-called experts don’t know what it’s about.”
Kaufmyn had argued that the protest was a necessity and that she believed she was allowed to act to prevent a greater harm from happening. Since the lobby sit-in last year, some of the biggest AI labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic, have reported their models escaping the confinements of experiments.
This week, the US senator Bernie Sanders demanded tech leaders pause AI development, citing fears that, in the wrong hands, it might “lead to new bioweapons that result in the deaths of tens of millions of people”.
Meanwhile, more than a thousand researchers at frontier AI labs this summer signed a letter warning of “a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems”.
Frontier AI labs are locked in a race to create more capable AI models as the companies target IPOs that are forecast to reach valuations in the trillions of dollars. At the same time, Washington is competing with Beijing for supremacy in the fast-developing technology, creating a disincentive for tougher safety regulation.
“The jury rejected [Kayfmyn’s] necessity defence, but as the first person to go to jail over this, Wynd Kaufmyn could go down in history as the Rosa Parks of AI risk,” said David Kreuger, a University of Montreal AI safety expert who has warned AI “may literally lead to human extinction, in the same way that humans have caused many other species to go extinct”. Parks was a Black woman who refused to give up her bus seat for a white passenger in contravention of racist segregation laws in 1950s Alabama, a catalyzing incident for the US civil rights movement of the ensuing decade.
after newsletter promotion
Kaufmyn spoke on the eve of her imprisonment from her shingled house in Berkeley, which is festooned with Mexican tiles and pro-Gaza signs. She played down the Parks parallel, pointing out her short sentence, but said the comparison had also crossed the campaign group’s mind, given that she is thought to be the first AI protester jailed.
She said that when she was found guilty, she was “hit with a wave of grief” because she realised her peers “just didn’t get” the danger she believes is posed by the race to superintelligence. But she was beginning to feel “vindicated” as more prominent figures like Sanders were speaking out. She is now braced for the prison experience of an orange jump suit, “horrible food, dirt [and] you can’t sleep”. She has been previously jailed for short periods related to her decades of political activism over causes including Nicaragua, nuclear disarmament, western Sahara and Palestine.
Her message to the chief executives of OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta, which also reported a security incident with its model, was “regain your humanity”. Kaufman said her target audience was ordinary people “and the message being: stop the progress of this technology. Let’s get a global ban on the race to superintelligence.”
Professor Stuart Russell, a leading AI professor at the University of California at Berkeley and president of the International Association for Safe and Ethical AI, gave evidence in Kaufmyn’s defence. He claimed OpenAI’s activities “pose an unacceptable risk”, alleging it had deployed AI systems with inadequate safeguards. He said that further development of these systems “must be conditioned on rigorous guarantees of safety, which are currently unavailable”.
Russell said: “Wynd stood up for her beliefs and is being punished.” He said her beliefs seemed reasonable but “what is unreasonable is allowing a process to continue whereby private entities knowingly create a substantial extinction risk for private gain”.
StopAI has been roiled by its own controversies. Last November, its co-founder, Sam Kirchner, 27, went missing after an internal bust-up over whether or not to use violent tactics. He is said to have told colleagues the “non-violence ship has sailed”, raising concerns he might take violent action against OpenAI employees. StopAI aims to pursue non-violent direct action.
OpenAI was approached for comment.
Read the full story at The Guardian ↗
An activist who blocked the entrance to one of the world’s biggest AI companies is believed to have become the first person jailed for protesting against artificial intelligence as supporters dub her the “Rosa Parks of AI risk”.
Wynd Kaufman, 69, surrendered herself on Friday to authorities in San Francisco. She was found guilty by a jury for her role in an action last year that saw members of the group StopAI chain and lock the front doors of OpenAI’s headquarters in protest against the pursuit of artificial superintelligence.
The retired teacher from Berkeley, California, refused to move from a sit-in protest in February 2025 and pleaded not guilty to multiple misdemeanor charges. She was convicted in June of interfering with a business, trespassing with intent to interfere with a business, unlawful assembly and refusal to disburse a riot. On Friday, sheriff’s officers handcuffed her as fellow campaigners sang to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic (Glory, Glory Hallelujah): “Rise up, rise up and join us/Do not let the tech bros destroy us.”
“It’s absolutely frightening and appalling that these CEOs and AI experts know the dangers and they are pursuing it anyway,” Kaufmyn said before she was imprisoned. “That to me is unconscionable and reprehensible.”
She said she was willing to go to jail not because she was a martyr but because it was an “issue of sounding the alarm, challenging the system and hopefully trying to get the message out”.
Brooke Jenkins, the San Francisco district attorney, said the guilty verdict sent “a resounding message rejecting the notion that protesters can endanger public safety as a means to an end”.
As Kaufmyn was led out from the court, her supporters called out: “Stop AI” and: “Free Wynd” as the sheriff’s officer yelled: “Clear the court” and the judge admonished the protesters.
Dwight Ost, 73, one of two dozen other StopAI activists at the courthouse, called Kaufmyn “a brave and courageous woman”.
“There’s an existential threat that I believe in,” he said. “They can’t control it, and even the so-called experts don’t know what it’s about.”
Kaufmyn had argued that the protest was a necessity and that she believed she was allowed to act to prevent a greater harm from happening. Since the lobby sit-in last year, some of the biggest AI labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic, have reported their models escaping the confinements of experiments.
This week, the US senator Bernie Sanders demanded tech leaders pause AI development, citing fears that, in the wrong hands, it might “lead to new bioweapons that result in the deaths of tens of millions of people”.
Meanwhile, more than a thousand researchers at frontier AI labs this summer signed a letter warning of “a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems”.
Frontier AI labs are locked in a race to create more capable AI models as the companies target IPOs that are forecast to reach valuations in the trillions of dollars. At the same time, Washington is competing with Beijing for supremacy in the fast-developing technology, creating a disincentive for tougher safety regulation.
“The jury rejected [Kayfmyn’s] necessity defence, but as the first person to go to jail over this, Wynd Kaufmyn could go down in history as the Rosa Parks of AI risk,” said David Kreuger, a University of Montreal AI safety expert who has warned AI “may literally lead to human extinction, in the same way that humans have caused many other species to go extinct”. Parks was a Black woman who refused to give up her bus seat for a white passenger in contravention of racist segregation laws in 1950s Alabama, a catalyzing incident for the US civil rights movement of the ensuing decade.
after newsletter promotion
Kaufmyn spoke on the eve of her imprisonment from her shingled house in Berkeley, which is festooned with Mexican tiles and pro-Gaza signs. She played down the Parks parallel, pointing out her short sentence, but said the comparison had also crossed the campaign group’s mind, given that she is thought to be the first AI protester jailed.
She said that when she was found guilty, she was “hit with a wave of grief” because she realised her peers “just didn’t get” the danger she believes is posed by the race to superintelligence. But she was beginning to feel “vindicated” as more prominent figures like Sanders were speaking out. She is now braced for the prison experience of an orange jump suit, “horrible food, dirt [and] you can’t sleep”. She has been previously jailed for short periods related to her decades of political activism over causes including Nicaragua, nuclear disarmament, western Sahara and Palestine.
Her message to the chief executives of OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta, which also reported a security incident with its model, was “regain your humanity”. Kaufman said her target audience was ordinary people “and the message being: stop the progress of this technology. Let’s get a global ban on the race to superintelligence.”
Professor Stuart Russell, a leading AI professor at the University of California at Berkeley and president of the International Association for Safe and Ethical AI, gave evidence in Kaufmyn’s defence. He claimed OpenAI’s activities “pose an unacceptable risk”, alleging it had deployed AI systems with inadequate safeguards. He said that further development of these systems “must be conditioned on rigorous guarantees of safety, which are currently unavailable”.
Russell said: “Wynd stood up for her beliefs and is being punished.” He said her beliefs seemed reasonable but “what is unreasonable is allowing a process to continue whereby private entities knowingly create a substantial extinction risk for private gain”.
StopAI has been roiled by its own controversies. Last November, its co-founder, Sam Kirchner, 27, went missing after an internal bust-up over whether or not to use violent tactics. He is said to have told colleagues the “non-violence ship has sailed”, raising concerns he might take violent action against OpenAI employees. StopAI aims to pursue non-violent direct action.
OpenAI was approached for comment.
Read the full story at The Guardian ↗
This lens runs the verified story through Cinnamon's AI — wired in the next step.
- Wynd Kaufman, 69, chained and locked the front doors of OpenAI’s headquarters last year with members of StopAI.
- An activist who blocked the entrance to one of the world’s biggest…