US supreme court rules Trump’s firing of Lisa Cook from Fed was unconstitutional
✓The US supreme court has refused Donald Trump’s attempts to immediately fire a Federal Reserve governor, in a landmark ruling that limits a president’s authority over the central bank.
In a 5-4 opinion, the court said that Lisa Cook can stay on as a governor while she fights unproved allegations of mortgage fraud made by the Trump officials.
“The court decides this application on the narrow ground that the president failed to afford Cook the procedural protections to which she was entitled by statute. Without such protections, she could not properly dispute the charges the president laid against her,” the justices said.
The case was centered on Cook, a Joe Biden appointee whose 14-year term on the Federal Reserve board of governors is scheduled to expire in 2038. Cook is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s board.
Last August, on social media, Trump abruptly fired Cook. The president claimed he had evidence that Cook committed mortgage fraud, an illegal practice where a homebuyer lists a second property as a primary resident to obtain a better mortgage rate. Cook denied the allegations and sued the Trump administration, saying it fired her without cause.
The justices’ protection over the Fed decision is a departure from how the court has handled Trump in his second term, allowing the president broad power to carry out his agenda without congressional approval.
On Monday, the court also ruled that Trump had the authority to fire Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission, who was removed from her position before her term ended.
The court has also allowed Trump to remove a Democratic-appointed member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), leaving the powerful union board without a quorum needed to decide on labor disputes. The court also stripped lower district courts of their power to issue nationwide injunctions, which was often used to block Trump in his first administration, and stayed a lower court’s ruling that restricted Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s (ICE) from using race and ethnicity as the basis for reasonable suspicion in immigration enforcement.
But the court seems determined to protect the Fed. The ruling is a major win for the central bank, which has spent the last year under attack from the White House.
Over the past year, most Fed officials have broadly ignored demands of loyalty from Trump, who believes interest rates should be lower. Trump has attacked the Fed for holding interest rates at levels he believes are too high and are stifling the economy. The independence of the Fed is widely regarded as sacrosanct, but Trump has continued to press for the central bank to follow his will.
Much of his ire over the last year has been directed at Jerome Powell, a Fed governor and former Fed chair who Trump first appointed in 2018. In January, the justice department placed Powell under investigation, purportedly over testimony he gave last summer about renovations at the Fed’s headquarters that went over budget.
after newsletter promotion
The justice department closed the investigation in April, after it attracted sharp backlash, but the White House has suggested the inspector’s general office is still looking into the renovations.
Before Powell’s term as chair ended in May, he announced he would stay on as a Fed governor – a rare move that signaled his concern over the future of Fed independence – until the White House’s investigations into the renovations are “well and truly over with transparency and finality”.
Kevin Warsh replaced Powell as chair in May and is expected to be much more amenable to interest rate cuts despite the impact it could have on prices, which have been heating up amid the war with Iran.
The Fed has vast power over the US economy because it sets interest rates, which determine the cost of borrowing money. Cook is one of 12 board members who vote eight times a year on interest rates. Economists widely agree that an independent central bank, removed from the pressure of politics, is essential for a stable economy.
The Fed was created in 1913 and while it technically sits inside the executive branch, it has historically been siloed from the White House and Congress.
Read the full story at BBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · Al Jazeera ↗ · BBC ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗
The Supreme Court has prevented President Trump from immediately removing Lisa Cook from her position as a Federal Reserve governor. In a 5-4 decision, the justices found that Trump failed to provide Cook with statutory procedural protections before firing her, which she needs to properly contest the unproven mortgage fraud allegations he cited. Cook, appointed by President Biden for a 14-year term expiring in 2038 and the first Black woman on the Fed's board, was fired via social media last August. She denied the allegations and sued. The ruling creates a notable exception to the Court's recent expansion of presidential removal powers: while the justices have allowed Trump to remove Democratic appointees from the Federal Trade Commission and National Labor Relations Board, they have specifically shielded the Federal Reserve from this authority. Trump has consistently pressed the Fed to lower interest rates, viewing them as economically restrictive, and has directed criticism at Fed leadership. Economists and policymakers broadly consider Fed independence from political pressure essential for economic stability.
Read the full story at BBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · Al Jazeera ↗ · BBC ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗
The US supreme court has refused Donald Trump’s attempts to immediately fire a Federal Reserve governor, in a landmark ruling that limits a president’s authority over the central bank.
In a 5-4 opinion, the court said that Lisa Cook can stay on as a governor while she fights unproved allegations of mortgage fraud made by the Trump officials.
“The court decides this application on the narrow ground that the president failed to afford Cook the procedural protections to which she was entitled by statute. Without such protections, she could not properly dispute the charges the president laid against her,” the justices said.
The case was centered on Cook, a Joe Biden appointee whose 14-year term on the Federal Reserve board of governors is scheduled to expire in 2038. Cook is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s board.
Last August, on social media, Trump abruptly fired Cook. The president claimed he had evidence that Cook committed mortgage fraud, an illegal practice where a homebuyer lists a second property as a primary resident to obtain a better mortgage rate. Cook denied the allegations and sued the Trump administration, saying it fired her without cause.
The justices’ protection over the Fed decision is a departure from how the court has handled Trump in his second term, allowing the president broad power to carry out his agenda without congressional approval.
On Monday, the court also ruled that Trump had the authority to fire Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission, who was removed from her position before her term ended.
The court has also allowed Trump to remove a Democratic-appointed member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), leaving the powerful union board without a quorum needed to decide on labor disputes. The court also stripped lower district courts of their power to issue nationwide injunctions, which was often used to block Trump in his first administration, and stayed a lower court’s ruling that restricted Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s (ICE) from using race and ethnicity as the basis for reasonable suspicion in immigration enforcement.
But the court seems determined to protect the Fed. The ruling is a major win for the central bank, which has spent the last year under attack from the White House.
Over the past year, most Fed officials have broadly ignored demands of loyalty from Trump, who believes interest rates should be lower. Trump has attacked the Fed for holding interest rates at levels he believes are too high and are stifling the economy. The independence of the Fed is widely regarded as sacrosanct, but Trump has continued to press for the central bank to follow his will.
Much of his ire over the last year has been directed at Jerome Powell, a Fed governor and former Fed chair who Trump first appointed in 2018. In January, the justice department placed Powell under investigation, purportedly over testimony he gave last summer about renovations at the Fed’s headquarters that went over budget.
after newsletter promotion
The justice department closed the investigation in April, after it attracted sharp backlash, but the White House has suggested the inspector’s general office is still looking into the renovations.
Before Powell’s term as chair ended in May, he announced he would stay on as a Fed governor – a rare move that signaled his concern over the future of Fed independence – until the White House’s investigations into the renovations are “well and truly over with transparency and finality”.
Kevin Warsh replaced Powell as chair in May and is expected to be much more amenable to interest rate cuts despite the impact it could have on prices, which have been heating up amid the war with Iran.
The Fed has vast power over the US economy because it sets interest rates, which determine the cost of borrowing money. Cook is one of 12 board members who vote eight times a year on interest rates. Economists widely agree that an independent central bank, removed from the pressure of politics, is essential for a stable economy.
The Fed was created in 1913 and while it technically sits inside the executive branch, it has historically been siloed from the White House and Congress.
Read the full story at BBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · Al Jazeera ↗ · BBC ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Trump failed to provide Lisa Cook with required procedural protections before firing her. Cook is a Biden appointee with a 14-year term on the Federal Reserve board scheduled to expire in 2038 and is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board. Trump fired Cook via social media last August, citing unproven mortgage fraud allegations that Cook denies. The Court said Cook is entitled to procedural protections to dispute charges against her before removal. The ruling represents a departure from the Court's recent pattern of expanding Trump's removal powers over independent agencies. The Court has allowed Trump to fire Democratic appointees at the Federal Trade Commission and National Labor Relations Board. Trump has pressured the Fed to lower interest rates, which he believes would improve economic conditions. Economists widely view central bank independence from political pressure as essential for a stable economy. The Fed's protection in this ruling represents a major win for an institution under sustained White House attack.
Read the full story at BBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · Al Jazeera ↗ · BBC ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · Axios ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗ · The Guardian ↗
- The US Supreme Court blocked Trump's attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, ruling 5-4 that he failed to provide required procedural protections before removing her.
- Cook, a Biden appointee and the first Black woman on the Fed's board, was fired via social media last August over unproven mortgage fraud allegations she denies.
- The ruling protects the Fed's independence from presidential removal power, contrasting with the Court's broader expansion of Trump's authority to fire leaders at other independent agencies.
- Trump has pressured the Fed to lower interest rates, which he believes would boost the economy, but economists widely view central bank independence from political pressure as essential for economic stability.